PDA

View Full Version : Tsar Nicholas II's family identified


Oolon Colluphid
01 Apr 2009, 12:27 PM
Politics... S&S... a non-existent History forum... ah well, Misc it is!

The bodies of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia's family have been definitively identified.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 106 no. 13 pp. 5258-5263 (31 March 2009)

Genomic identification in the historical case of the Nicholas II royal family

Rogaev et al.

Accurate unambiguous identification of ancient or historical specimens can potentially be achieved by DNA analysis. The controversy surrounding the fate of the last Russian Emperor, Nicholas II, and his family has persisted, in part, because the bodies of 2 children, Prince Alexei and 1 of his sisters, have not been found.

A grave discovered in 1991 contained remains putatively identified as those of the Russian Royal family. However, not all family members were represented.

Here, we report the results of genomic analyses of new specimens, the human remains of 2 burned skeletons exhumed from a grave discovered in July 2007, and the results of a comprehensive genomic analysis of remains from the 1991 discovery.

Additionally, ≈117 years old archival blood specimens from Nicholas II were obtained and genotyped, which provided critical material for the specific determination of individual identities and kinship identifications.

Results of genotypic analyses of damaged historical specimens were evaluated alongside samples from descendants of both paternal and maternal lineages of the European Royal families, and the results conclusively demonstrate that the recently found remains belong to children of Nicholas II: Prince Alexei and his sister.

The results of our studies provide unequivocal evidence that the remains of Nicholas II and his entire family, including all 5 children, have been identified. We demonstrate that convergent analysis of complete mitochondrial genome sequences combined with nuclear DNA profiles is an efficient and conclusive method for individual and kinship identification of specimens obtained from old historic relics.

DMB
01 Apr 2009, 01:00 PM
Will this finally put an end to the Anastasia garbage? Will it hell!

There are still people who are interested in who ought to be the true monarch of the UK since the throne was "usurped" by Edward IV of England in 1461or by Henry VII of England in 1485 or by William III of England in 1689...

Anne
01 Apr 2009, 01:02 PM
I liked the mystery and romance...

:(

hecaterin
01 Apr 2009, 11:07 PM
Will this finally put an end to the Anastasia garbage? Will it hell!

There are still people who are interested in who ought to be the true monarch of the UK since the throne was "usurped" by Edward IV of England in 1461or by Henry VII of England in 1485 or by William III of England in 1689...Well, there's interest, and then there's mania. I could be interested.

Baldrick Tony Robinson did a show where he traced one such putative royal line to an Australian country family. I forget exactly which line. Showed up at the door with the "you are rightwise born king of England" line, and got a cup of tea and a scone and a nice chat about family history out of it.

Oh wait, I googled it: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3368731.stm
He's supposed to be the Plantagenet heir, based on Edward IV being illegitimate. And in other news, King Michael is a republican. :)

darjeeling
01 Apr 2009, 11:24 PM
I wonder how the church is going to react.