rlogan
23 Apr 2009, 07:26 PM
Remember the outrage when the pictures of Abu Graihb were exposed?
Pictures of naked men, dogs, men hooded in stress positions, etc? Soldiers went to jail for that.
Remember Rumsfeld's "a few bad apples" denials, and Bush's "we don't torture, etc?
There are a slew of memorandums now released by virtue of a lawsuit against the government, plus a new senate report out, the red cross report, and others that lets us summarize this whole ugly chapter in U.S. history.
Shortly after 9/11 at the behest of the white house, inquiries were made with the SERE program, which was a training program designed to put military personell through the various tortures used by (for example) the communist chinese in North Korea to extract false "confessions" out of US soldiers for propaganda purposes. It was NOT a program having anything to do with intelligence collection.
The SERE people had no experience in intelligence collection. The program was expressly geared to prepare men for practices illegal under Geneva and other conventions against torture.
The white house ordered both the CIA and the Military, in their parallel prison systems, to adopt these practices, and ordered the justice department to create phony legal window-dressing to cover their asses for what they knew was illegal.
The white house was then busy creating phony propaganda against Saddam Hussein (forger niger uranium documents, false assertion of meetings between Al Qaeda and Iraq, etc.). The office in charge of that was the Office of Special Plans. Even the name demonstrates they planned to invade Iraq on false pretenses. Downing street memos confirmed that - we simply told British we were manufacturing the "intelligence".
And now, finally, you can google this all over the internet - they used torture to try extracting a false link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. That was apparently the most important driving motivation for its use.
It is inconceivable to most Americans, and despite it being now public information of the most sober, careful, and fully documented official inquiry - it will not be widely accepted that our government did exactly what the SERE program tortures were all about:
Torturing to extract false "confessions" (along with manufacturing other phony propaganda) in order to cover what was in fact a war of aggression - a war crime.
We sent people to prison who were following orders that came ultimately from our president. Nobody was saying what Obama is saying now when we were trying them, imprisoning them, and screeching about how horrific their actions were.
Instead now Obama is saying that the people who ordered the torture we imprisoned people for should be overlooked, and that anyone else who committed torture - well, they were following orders so we won't prosecute them.
What about pardons then for the people we already convicted? Nobody is calling for that, are they? We just convicted a sergeant for murder, and I do not see how this isn't true for the whole Iraq war of aggression.
The only thing that has changed since their convictions is that we see finally it was much more widespread, that it was ordered by our president - and it was specifically deployed to create false justifications for war crimes.
The disconnect is just incredible that we prosecuted soldiers for this with such fanfare and self-righteous "this is not America" fervor - but Obama is now saying oh shucks, let bygones be bygones, let's not enforce the law because that would be "retribution"
His attorney general is cooing on about how we are now going to live by the rule of law - except of course we're just not going to actually enforce it.
Remember the stupid "ticking time bomb" scenario they were using to justify torture? That was when they were busy torturing people in an effort to produce false confessions "justifying" war crimes.
Obama is now pretending the orders to torture were based on a sincere concern to protect the american people, and understandable after 9/11. The ticking time bomb excuse.
But that isn't why they were doing it. It was part of a multifacited program that was about creating false "intelligence" to justify war crimes, and I can't think of a more ghastly thing deserving of placing our president on trial for war crimes and making sure no president in the future ever consideres it.
And the way you do that is by meting out the same justice we did for the Japanese and German officials we found guilty of the same things.
Pictures of naked men, dogs, men hooded in stress positions, etc? Soldiers went to jail for that.
Remember Rumsfeld's "a few bad apples" denials, and Bush's "we don't torture, etc?
There are a slew of memorandums now released by virtue of a lawsuit against the government, plus a new senate report out, the red cross report, and others that lets us summarize this whole ugly chapter in U.S. history.
Shortly after 9/11 at the behest of the white house, inquiries were made with the SERE program, which was a training program designed to put military personell through the various tortures used by (for example) the communist chinese in North Korea to extract false "confessions" out of US soldiers for propaganda purposes. It was NOT a program having anything to do with intelligence collection.
The SERE people had no experience in intelligence collection. The program was expressly geared to prepare men for practices illegal under Geneva and other conventions against torture.
The white house ordered both the CIA and the Military, in their parallel prison systems, to adopt these practices, and ordered the justice department to create phony legal window-dressing to cover their asses for what they knew was illegal.
The white house was then busy creating phony propaganda against Saddam Hussein (forger niger uranium documents, false assertion of meetings between Al Qaeda and Iraq, etc.). The office in charge of that was the Office of Special Plans. Even the name demonstrates they planned to invade Iraq on false pretenses. Downing street memos confirmed that - we simply told British we were manufacturing the "intelligence".
And now, finally, you can google this all over the internet - they used torture to try extracting a false link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. That was apparently the most important driving motivation for its use.
It is inconceivable to most Americans, and despite it being now public information of the most sober, careful, and fully documented official inquiry - it will not be widely accepted that our government did exactly what the SERE program tortures were all about:
Torturing to extract false "confessions" (along with manufacturing other phony propaganda) in order to cover what was in fact a war of aggression - a war crime.
We sent people to prison who were following orders that came ultimately from our president. Nobody was saying what Obama is saying now when we were trying them, imprisoning them, and screeching about how horrific their actions were.
Instead now Obama is saying that the people who ordered the torture we imprisoned people for should be overlooked, and that anyone else who committed torture - well, they were following orders so we won't prosecute them.
What about pardons then for the people we already convicted? Nobody is calling for that, are they? We just convicted a sergeant for murder, and I do not see how this isn't true for the whole Iraq war of aggression.
The only thing that has changed since their convictions is that we see finally it was much more widespread, that it was ordered by our president - and it was specifically deployed to create false justifications for war crimes.
The disconnect is just incredible that we prosecuted soldiers for this with such fanfare and self-righteous "this is not America" fervor - but Obama is now saying oh shucks, let bygones be bygones, let's not enforce the law because that would be "retribution"
His attorney general is cooing on about how we are now going to live by the rule of law - except of course we're just not going to actually enforce it.
Remember the stupid "ticking time bomb" scenario they were using to justify torture? That was when they were busy torturing people in an effort to produce false confessions "justifying" war crimes.
Obama is now pretending the orders to torture were based on a sincere concern to protect the american people, and understandable after 9/11. The ticking time bomb excuse.
But that isn't why they were doing it. It was part of a multifacited program that was about creating false "intelligence" to justify war crimes, and I can't think of a more ghastly thing deserving of placing our president on trial for war crimes and making sure no president in the future ever consideres it.
And the way you do that is by meting out the same justice we did for the Japanese and German officials we found guilty of the same things.