PDA

View Full Version : BioLogos, Francis Collins' New Website


ck1
01 May 2009, 12:55 AM
Francis Collins recently left his position as head of the Human Genome Institute at NIH.

He has long been interested in science and religion, as evidenced by his book, The Language of God.

He has now started a new website, BioLogos, with Karl Giberson:

http://biologos.org/

BioLogos is led by a team of believing scientists who are committed to promoting a perspective of both theological and scientific soundness, which takes seriously the claims of theism and of evolution, and finds compelling evidence for their compatibility.

The site attempts to explain evolutionary biology to Christians who may be sceptical of the science. Here is their mission statement:

Dr. Francis Collins established The BioLogos Foundation to engage America’s escalating culture war between science and faith. On one side of the conversation, the “new atheists” argue that science removes the need for God. On the other side, religious fundamentalists argue that the Bible requires us to reject much of modern science. Many scientists, believers, and members of the general public do not find these options attractive.

There is therefore a great need to contribute to the public voice that represents the harmony of science and faith. BioLogos addresses the core themes of science and religion, and emphasizes the compatibility of Christian faith with what science has discovered about the origins of the universe and life. In order to communicate this message to the general public, The BioLogos Foundation has created BioLogos.org.

Funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, the website articulates the compatibility of modern science with traditional Christian belief. Among other resources, this website posts responses to many of the questions received by Collins, Giberson, and Falk since the publication of their books, including: The Language of God; Saving Darwin; and Coming to Peace With Science. By providing trustworthy insight, BioLogos.org stands as a reliable source of scholarly thought on contemporary issues in science and faith.

Some of the info on the site seems odd, like some of the questions they pose and answer:

What is the proper relationship between science and religion?Science and religion are sometimes thought to offer entirely separate bodies of knowledge. However, science is not the only source of factual statements, and religion does reach beyond the realm of values and morals.

What factual statements can be derived from religion, and what does religion teach that has to do with the natural world?

Is there room in BioLogos to believe in miracles?This response provides a simple answer to the question of miracles – namely, that BioLogos does not in any way remove the logical possibility of miracles. However, for the universe to behave in an apparently ordered fashion, such events must be rare.

Oh, my.

At what point in the evolutionary process did humans attain the “Image of God”?Most theologians argue that the Image of God is not reflected as a physical image, but rather as characteristics of the mind and soul. From the BioLogos perspective, God planned for humans to evolve to the point of attaining these characteristics.


Is it possible to bend over too far to accomodate religion?

DMB
01 May 2009, 10:38 AM
Is it possible to bend over too far to accomodate religion?

Collins is exceptional in being a top scientist who hangs on to religion. It must be very difficult.

Ray Moscow
01 May 2009, 11:08 AM
Is it possible to bend over too far to accomodate religion?

It depends on whether you want to be religion's prison bitch.

Worldtraveller
01 May 2009, 11:15 AM
PZ Myers has a ceouple of posts about this. Some good comments over there.

Notta
02 May 2009, 01:20 PM
PZ Myers has a ceouple of posts about this. Some good comments over there.Link?

And I always found something vaguely creepy about Francis Collins and his faith. Where do miracles have a place in science and investigation of the natural world??

Ray Moscow
02 May 2009, 05:27 PM
Jerry Coyle's blog (http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/shoot-me-now-francis-collinss-new-supernaturalist-website/) has some nice comments about this, too.

Brother Daniel
02 May 2009, 10:03 PM
Where do miracles have a place in science and investigation of the natural world??
Nowhere at all -- and Collins would probably concede that.

I'm guessing he'd say that science is the study of the non-miraculous. :)

lpetrich
03 May 2009, 06:38 PM
The next question is: how does one tell the difference between a miracle and a non-miracle?

RBH
06 May 2009, 03:12 AM
I read his book shortly after it came out, and then went to a panel discussion he was on. I have to say his thinking about how his religion and science go together is exceptionally muddy.

Notta
06 May 2009, 01:13 PM
I heard him give a couple of talks on it. I would think someone who has a faith as strong as his who studies genetics would have to muddy the boundaries between science & religion just to get through the day. I know he was highly respected as a scientist, but I found him more of a Christian apologist than scientist. That's just my opinion, though.

Ray Moscow
06 May 2009, 01:16 PM
I heard him give a couple of talks on it. I would think someone who has a faith as strong as his who studies genetics would have to muddy the boundaries between science & religion just to get through the day. I know he was highly respected as a scientist, but I found him more of a Christian apologist than scientist. That's just my opinion, though.

I remember him in the "Dawkins on Darwin" TV series saying "when I look at the genetic code, I realise that evolution is true," to which Dawkins replied, "Yes, of course it's true" or some such.

I suppose Dawkins is surprised to find scientists who still somewhat in doubt about the TOE.

ck1
06 May 2009, 01:24 PM
Last fall I participated in a 9-week discussion group at a local church on science and religion. The discussion was based on a series of videos narrated by Collins. He also gave the first presentation in the series, on genetics. The series included physicists and philosophers and theologians. Much of what was said about the science/religion connection was muddy, and the rest was overtly religious - such as a discussion on the goodness of God and the wonders of Creation.

Many of the other participants in the discussion group had scientific backgrounds or were educators, so it turned out to be an interesting 9 weeks, even if the videos were mostly annoying.