Yahoo!!
05 May 2009, 02:10 AM
I wasn't able to figure out where to post this (feel free to move it elsewhere), but I felt this fora was suitable to this law being proposed in my home province of Alberta.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/04/30/cgy-bill-evolution-law-alberta-classes-teachers.html
Currently, the Alberta legislature is looking to make a law that would make it possible for parents to pull their children out of specific classes for "religious" reasons. Now, I don't have an issue with certain classes, like some religious studies, etc. However, this might also fall under the category of evolution and allow students to opt out of learning evolution because it conflicts with their religious values. This also applies to geology, plate tectonics, etc as well because of the same thing. Teachers now have to be careful about what they talk about for their curriculum because it suddenly might "object" to a student's religious thinking.
This is different home schooling option and such because the student still remains in the public school system. I am enraged this is being proposed in my province. It stifles debate and makes it possible for students to graduate from public education without ever having to learn about evolutionary biology. The minister insists this would not be possible under this legislation, but I have a hard time believing this is true.
My question is.. what tactics to deal with these kind of laws are used by scientists in much more conservative states that impose these kind of rules. How does the scientist/educator deal with this kind of stupidity?
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/04/30/cgy-bill-evolution-law-alberta-classes-teachers.html
Currently, the Alberta legislature is looking to make a law that would make it possible for parents to pull their children out of specific classes for "religious" reasons. Now, I don't have an issue with certain classes, like some religious studies, etc. However, this might also fall under the category of evolution and allow students to opt out of learning evolution because it conflicts with their religious values. This also applies to geology, plate tectonics, etc as well because of the same thing. Teachers now have to be careful about what they talk about for their curriculum because it suddenly might "object" to a student's religious thinking.
This is different home schooling option and such because the student still remains in the public school system. I am enraged this is being proposed in my province. It stifles debate and makes it possible for students to graduate from public education without ever having to learn about evolutionary biology. The minister insists this would not be possible under this legislation, but I have a hard time believing this is true.
My question is.. what tactics to deal with these kind of laws are used by scientists in much more conservative states that impose these kind of rules. How does the scientist/educator deal with this kind of stupidity?