DMB
13 Oct 2010, 07:29 AM
The Swiss canton of Valais (Wallis in German) has a tradition of staunch Catholicism. It is where the Vatican's Swiss Guards come from. Now it looks as though they may be in the middle of a human rights row over a crucifix.
A secondary teacher, who happens to be the President of the local chapter of the Freethinkers, had removed a crucifix from the wall of his classroom a year ago. But at the beginning of the new school year, when he again removed the crucifix he was summarily dismissed. He had in the mean time got involved in an argument about whether public schools should be promoting Christianity/Catholicism at all, and there are suspicions that his resulting higher profile may have been the reason for his dismissal.
Federal law would seem to be on his side, although it is not crystal clear. Almost certainly, European human rights law would support him. But the canton points to cantonal law which says that public schooling has the following objective:
Art. 3 Mission générale de l’école
L’école valaisanne a la mission générale de seconder la famille dans l’éducation et l’instruction de la jeunesse. A cet effet, elle recherche la collaboration des Eglises reconnues de droit public (appelées ci-après Eglises).
Elle s’efforce de développer le sens moral, les facultés intellectuelles et physiques de l’élève, de le préparer à sa tâche de personne humaine et de chrétien.
my bold
Rough translation:
The school of the Valais has the general mission to second the family in the education and instruction of youth. To achieve this it seeks the collaboration of the churches recognised by public law. It endeavours to develop the pupil's moral sense and intellectual and physical ability in order to prepare him for his tasks as a human being and a Christian.
It was this paragraph that they used as justification for the dismissal.
A secondary teacher, who happens to be the President of the local chapter of the Freethinkers, had removed a crucifix from the wall of his classroom a year ago. But at the beginning of the new school year, when he again removed the crucifix he was summarily dismissed. He had in the mean time got involved in an argument about whether public schools should be promoting Christianity/Catholicism at all, and there are suspicions that his resulting higher profile may have been the reason for his dismissal.
Federal law would seem to be on his side, although it is not crystal clear. Almost certainly, European human rights law would support him. But the canton points to cantonal law which says that public schooling has the following objective:
Art. 3 Mission générale de l’école
L’école valaisanne a la mission générale de seconder la famille dans l’éducation et l’instruction de la jeunesse. A cet effet, elle recherche la collaboration des Eglises reconnues de droit public (appelées ci-après Eglises).
Elle s’efforce de développer le sens moral, les facultés intellectuelles et physiques de l’élève, de le préparer à sa tâche de personne humaine et de chrétien.
my bold
Rough translation:
The school of the Valais has the general mission to second the family in the education and instruction of youth. To achieve this it seeks the collaboration of the churches recognised by public law. It endeavours to develop the pupil's moral sense and intellectual and physical ability in order to prepare him for his tasks as a human being and a Christian.
It was this paragraph that they used as justification for the dismissal.